![]() Then you can do the encoding, which does use a lot of cpu, from the hard drive. ![]() So it's good to just use the drive for the decrypting part, since that doesn't take much cpu. iso with imgburn in either takes the same amount of time. ![]() One is about 3 times faster than the other. They're definitely the slowest thing in your machine. Using one program to both rip and encode sounds good, but I've found that using dvdfab decrypter followed by handbrake is actually faster. Given the inherent complexity of video encoding and the lack of consistent standards, that's hard to do. I think it has the best balance between power and ease of use. As mentioned, it's really the same encoder with different interfaces. The encoder part ( DVDFab) is trialware and it's not as good really. Good program (it supports separate chapters) but it won't work with many newer discs. DVD Decrypter hasn't been updated since 2005.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |